None of this information could have possibly come from any DNC server. They found that the GRU officers secretly surveiled an empoyee of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee all day in real time, including spying on вЂњher individual banking information and other personal topics.вЂќ They showed that вЂњGuccifer 2.0,вЂќ the supposed lone hacker behind the DNC hack, was in fact managed by a specific GRU unit, and even reconstructed the internet searches made within that unit while a GRU officer with shoddy English skills was drafting the first post as Guccifer 2.0. The FBI and Robert MuellerвЂ™s investigators discovered when and how specific Russian military officers logged into a control panel on a leased machine in Arizona.

And the latest indictments are rich with details that likely come from intercepting command-and-control boxes (in effect, bugging those getaway cars) and have nothing to do with physical access to the DNCвЂ™s servers. Investigators want access to the attack infrastructure-the equivalent to a chain of getaway cars of a team of burglars. (Besides, there wasnвЂ™t just one server, but 140.)ДЄn advanced investigation of an advanced hacking operation requires significantly more than just access to servers. By physically handing over a server to the FBI as Trump suggested, the DNC would in fact have destroyed evidence. ItвЂ™s the difference between watching a house over time, carefully noting down who comes and goes and when and how, versus handing over a key to a lonely boarded-up building. Live hard drive and memory snapshots of blinking, powered-on machines in a network reveal significantly more forensic data than some powered-off server removed from a network. For the purposes of an investigation of this type, images are much more useful than handing over metal and hardware, because they are bit-by-bit copies of a crime scene taken while the crime was going on. And a close read of it all shows why TrumpвЂ™s вЂњDNC didnвЂ™t give the server to the FBIвЂќ conspiracy theory makes no sense.ДЇirst off, CrowdStrike, the company the DNC brought in to initially investigate and remediate the hack, actually shared images of the DNC servers with the FBI. The FBI named-and-shamed two specific GRU units, their commanding officers and 10 subordinate officers while revealing stunning details of RussiaвЂ™s hacking tradecraft. The indictment is historically unprecedented in scope and detail. election, including by hacking into the DNC. Three days earlier, special counsel Robert Mueller published an indictment of 12 officers from the GRU, the Russian military intelligence service, for interfering in the 2016 U.S. TrumpвЂ™s view is unmoored from reality in several ways.

What is the dnc server